A 380% Rise in Protected Belief Cases Tells Us Something Important About Workplace Culture
When I read that employment tribunal cases involving protected beliefs had increased by 380% over the last five years, my first reaction wasn't surprise.
My reaction was that we're seeing the natural consequence of a workplace that is becoming more diverse, more vocal and, in many ways, more willing to tackle difficult conversations head-on.
I don't see that as a negative. The challenge is that protected belief cases often sit in the grey areas.
I've spent years talking to employers about workplace culture, and one thing I've learned is that people are usually looking for certainty. They want clear rules and answers. But when it comes to protected beliefs, that's often not possible.
We're talking about deeply held convictions, personal identities and strongly felt views. In my experience, these situations are rarely resolved by a policy alone. They require judgement, empathy and a willingness to engage with complexity.
What concerns me more than the rise in tribunal cases is what happens before a case ever reaches that stage.
I believe most workplace issues give organisations opportunities to intervene earlier. The problem is that many employees don't always feel confident raising concerns, and many managers don't always feel equipped to handle them.
I've seen organisations invest heavily in policies and procedures while overlooking the human conversations that sit behind them. For me, that's where the real work happens. I think employers should be asking themselves the following questions.
- Do people trust us enough to speak up?
- Would we know if tensions were building within a team?
- Are managers confident enough to navigate disagreement without immediately escalating it into a formal process?
Organisations don't need to fear these conversations, they need to get better at having them.
What we're reading
Latest insights from the front lines of workplace culture.
Why Collecting Misconduct Data Isn't Enough to Meet the New All Reasonable Steps Duty
Our co-founder and CEO, Gemma McCall, has written a piece for The HR Director exploring one of the most persistent gaps in workplace misconduct management: the space between collecting data and actually using it.
%20(1).png)
The NDA Ban Under the Employment Rights Act: What It Means for HR
When you can no longer buy silence, you have to invest in safety. That's the shift HR teams now need to plan for. Some organisations have historically leaned on settlement agreements and non-disclosure agreements to resolve harassment complaints quietly, keeping the details contained and the reputational risk low. The Employment Rights Act 2025 closes that option down. Once the NDA ban comes into force, a culture of silence stops being something the law will let you enforce.
Third Party Harassment: The Blind Spot in Most Workplace Harassment Policies
Most harassment policies are built around one scenario: two colleagues, one incident. But a lot of harassment comes from outside the organisation - customers, clients, patients, delegates - and the law is catching up. Learn what third party harassment looks like in practice, where employer liability stands under the Worker Protection Act, and what changes from October 2026 under the Employment Rights Act, including a higher bar for "reasonable steps" and liability from the first incident.
Feeling inspired?
Take the first step toward preventative misconduct management with a demo of our Report + Support™ platform. We can show you how to breakdown reporting barriers with anonymous 2-way messaging, and how to act before things escalate with name-matching and pattern-spotting across our analytics dashboard.
